Memo to Madonna: Take Me Instead!
Does Madonna's adoption backlash seem ridiculous to everyone, or is it just me?
Maybe I haven't been keeping up, but as far as I can tell, an underfunded orphanage with no waiting list is getting some attention from one of the world's richest people, who wants to adopt and take responsibility for one of the world's poorest people. This is, by all accounts, pure evil.
I'm confused. Why can't Madonna adopt a baby?
OK, so she may have been set on adopting a child from the U.S. before a dinner with Brad and Angelina convinced her to think globally. But is that so bad? There are plenty of children around the world in need of being adopted, and Madonna and her husband are a transcontinental couple, which essentially frees them from any ridiculous nationalistic allegiances.
Now the kid's dad is saying he didn't understand what adoption meant when he agreed to it. But is this Madonna's fault? I mean, this man took his son and placed him in an orphanage, which in any language says, "You raise him. I can't." Then, when the rich white woman and camera crews came around, he starts raving about how happy he is that his son is going to be cared for by this famous woman, and how wonderful his son's life will be in America. So what's he complaining about now? That when the baby grows up he won't be sent back to Africa? Come on - the kid'll be a Ciccone-Ritchie. It's not like you won't be able to find him one day. And if anyone can afford to travel back to Africa (as well as East Berlin, Tokyo, Bilbao - wherever there's a party) Madonna's son can. And, by the way, if this were a traditional American adoption and the birth parent backed out at this stage, it would seem cruel to the adoptive parents. This is the stuff of countless Lifetime movies, but because Madonna is involved, we're stone cold.
Could it be that this father has made the quickest media-savvy turnaround on record? Maybe whoever helped him realize he didn't really understand adoption also clued him in on the way things work in celebrity culture. Rule No. One: Make them want you more than you want them. Rule No. Two: Nothing truly fabulous comes easy (or cheap). Rule No. Three: If Page Six says so, it must be so. Rule No. Four: If it takes their minds off the war, it leads. And so on.
Granted, we don't know Madonna's true motives - she may be after a third-world accessory to carry around in her purse; she may be growing her own little troupe of back-up dancers; she may be staffing a sweatshop to fuel a new line of yoga wear. The possibilities are endless! Or maybe - just maybe - she, like most parents who decide to adopt, has love and support to offer and wants to share it with a child who has little of either. Regardless, I don't even like Madonna and I'd let her adopt me, no questions asked. And I'm a well-fed adult with my own clothes, bed and home.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who wants to care for and support a child should be able to hook up with an orphaned child. That goes for Madonna and all of her friends. And George W. Bush and all of his friends (except for Mark Foley, of course). And everyone I know, and everyone reading this, and all of your friends.
But I'm obviously confused.
Maybe I haven't been keeping up, but as far as I can tell, an underfunded orphanage with no waiting list is getting some attention from one of the world's richest people, who wants to adopt and take responsibility for one of the world's poorest people. This is, by all accounts, pure evil.
I'm confused. Why can't Madonna adopt a baby?
OK, so she may have been set on adopting a child from the U.S. before a dinner with Brad and Angelina convinced her to think globally. But is that so bad? There are plenty of children around the world in need of being adopted, and Madonna and her husband are a transcontinental couple, which essentially frees them from any ridiculous nationalistic allegiances.
Now the kid's dad is saying he didn't understand what adoption meant when he agreed to it. But is this Madonna's fault? I mean, this man took his son and placed him in an orphanage, which in any language says, "You raise him. I can't." Then, when the rich white woman and camera crews came around, he starts raving about how happy he is that his son is going to be cared for by this famous woman, and how wonderful his son's life will be in America. So what's he complaining about now? That when the baby grows up he won't be sent back to Africa? Come on - the kid'll be a Ciccone-Ritchie. It's not like you won't be able to find him one day. And if anyone can afford to travel back to Africa (as well as East Berlin, Tokyo, Bilbao - wherever there's a party) Madonna's son can. And, by the way, if this were a traditional American adoption and the birth parent backed out at this stage, it would seem cruel to the adoptive parents. This is the stuff of countless Lifetime movies, but because Madonna is involved, we're stone cold.
Could it be that this father has made the quickest media-savvy turnaround on record? Maybe whoever helped him realize he didn't really understand adoption also clued him in on the way things work in celebrity culture. Rule No. One: Make them want you more than you want them. Rule No. Two: Nothing truly fabulous comes easy (or cheap). Rule No. Three: If Page Six says so, it must be so. Rule No. Four: If it takes their minds off the war, it leads. And so on.
Granted, we don't know Madonna's true motives - she may be after a third-world accessory to carry around in her purse; she may be growing her own little troupe of back-up dancers; she may be staffing a sweatshop to fuel a new line of yoga wear. The possibilities are endless! Or maybe - just maybe - she, like most parents who decide to adopt, has love and support to offer and wants to share it with a child who has little of either. Regardless, I don't even like Madonna and I'd let her adopt me, no questions asked. And I'm a well-fed adult with my own clothes, bed and home.
As far as I'm concerned, anyone who wants to care for and support a child should be able to hook up with an orphaned child. That goes for Madonna and all of her friends. And George W. Bush and all of his friends (except for Mark Foley, of course). And everyone I know, and everyone reading this, and all of your friends.
But I'm obviously confused.
posted by j.m. at 3:49 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home